Home
Members Only
Membership
Donations
Reviews
Store
Mail List

Legal


In Association with Amazon.com





February 17, 2006

Review: Evaluating the Apple PowerMac G5 2.5GHz Quad-Core
By Michael Bean & Robert Zusman

Introduction
On October 19, 2005 Apple computer announced the PowerMac G5 Quad-Core along with the Dual-Core PowerMac G5 2.0GHz and 2.3GHz models. All three models utilize the same aluminum enclosure as previous PowerMac G5 models. In fact, if you are only looking at the external appearance of the PowerMac G5 Quad-Core and compare it to the original PowerMac G5 2.0GHz Dual (as shown in the image above) you will find very few external differences between the two models.

What's Included
The Power Mac G5 Quad includes two 2.5 GHz dual-core PowerPC G5 processors, a new PCI Express architecture with the NVIDIA GeForce 6600 256MB graphics card. Higher performance graphics options are available including the GeForce 7800 ($350) and the NVIDIA’s Quadro FX 4500 ($1650). The PowerMac G5 comes with 512MB of 533MHz DDR2 memory. It has eight memory slots that can be used to upgrade to as much as 16GB of memory using 2GB chips. Each 2.5 GHz dual-core processor has 1MB of L2 cache and a front side bus speed of 1.25GHz. The PowerMac G5 Quad has three open PCI Express expansion slots: two four-lane slots and one eight-lane slot. A 250GB SATA hard drive and a 16x SuperDrive with double-layer support (DVD+R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW) are included. One FireWire 800 port is provided on the rear. Two FireWire 400 ports are provided. One in front and one in the rear. Four USB 2.0 ports are included, with three on the rear and one in front. No modem is included but two gigabit ethernet ports are provided. Wireless airport, bluetooth and an external modem are optional.

The package comes with an Apple Keyboard, Mighty Mouse, USB keyboard extension cable and DVI to VGA adapter. Software provided with the PowerMac G5 Quad includes Mac OS X, iLife (includes iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie HD, iDVD, and GarageBand), iCal, DVD Player, Classic environment, GraphicConverter, OmniGraffle, OmniOutliner, QuickBooks New User Edition, Zinio Reader and Xcode Development Tools.

Components
The stock PowerMac G5 Quad only has 512MB of memory installed. This is the same amount of memory that Apple provides with the Mac mini. A $3,299 price tag should provide at least 1GB of installed memory in the standard configuration. Apple evidently disagrees. While you can operate the Quad with 512MB of memory, the performance is degraded considerably and a few programs will not operate. This will lead 99% of all PowerMac G5 Quad owners to purchase additional memory for their computer. Apple charges $300 for upgrading the Quad with two non-EEC 1GB memory chips using the build to order option and they keep the 512MB that is standard with the stock model. As most readers may know, buying memory from Apple is usually the most expensive option you can select.


Four 533MHz DDR2 SDRAM (PC2-4200) memory slots on top. Four on the bottom.

Installing 2.5GB of memory or more in the PowerMac G5 Quad provides good performance. Two additional 1GB PC2-4200, 533MHz SDRAM modules were installed in the PowerMac G5 Quad at a price of $160 shipped from 18004MEMORY. Memory prices vary, so your price may be higher or lower. The original 512MB of memory was left installed in the first two slots. Memory must be installed in pairs of equal size and specification with one DIMM in Bank 1 (top) and one in Bank 2 (bottom), moving outward as each additional pair is added. See the illustration below for more details.



Page 51 of the PowerMac G5 (Late 2005) manual provides detailed memory installation instructions for the Quad. You will find the PowerMac G5 Quad is much more responsive with additional memory installed. Once the memory is added you may want to test it using the Apple hardware Test (v2.52) that is located on Disc one of the Quad install DVDs. Simply boot from install Disc one while holding down the option key. Then, select Hardware Test as the boot partition. This will allow you to test the logic board, mass storage, memory and video RAM. Pushing "Quick Test" will provide a 12 minute 25 second test of the PowerMac G5 Quad with all of the fans running at full blast. Don't worry, this is normal for a hardware test running on a PowerMac G5. If your memory passes the test, you are ready to put the Quad to work.

Hard Drive
The PowerMac G5 Quad ships with a Maxtor 250GB DiamondMax 10 model 6L250MO SATA150 3.5" hard drive. This hard drive is an 8MB model. The 16MB version of the Maxtor 250GB DiamondMax 10 is model: 6L250S0 but it appears that Apple is only installing the 8MB version in the PowerMac G5 Quad. The PowerMac G5 Quad has two 3.5" SATA hard drive bays.



The top SATA drive bay is labeled "A" and the bottom "B". Four rubberized screws are provided for each drive. Four spare screws are mounted on the left side of the plastic drive bay for use with a second drive. The new PowerMac G5 Quad SATA power cabling is provided by a single cable from the top of the "A" bay. SATA data cables are located on top of the "A" bay and underneath the "B" bay. The original PowerMac G5 has a separate SATA power cable for each bay which is a cleaner but probably more expensive solution than the single SATA power cable provided with the PowerMac G5 Quad.

While the stock Maxtor 250GB is a nice SATA hard drive, you can upgrade the PowerMac G5 Quad to a Maxtor MaxLine III 7V300F0 300GB 3.0Gb/s SATA hard drive for additional write performance and a five year warranty. As a test, a Maxtor MaxLine III 7V300F0 300GB was installed in the PowerMac G5 Quad and compared against the stock Maxtor 250GB that is shipped with the Quad. In this test, both hard drives have the same 142GB of data on them. Drive Genius 1.2 was used to benchmark each hard drive. The results are below.

Sustained Read

Maxtor 250GB 8MB hard drive is green. Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB 16MB model 7V300F0 is blue.

In the Sustained Read test both drives perform almost identically when mounted on the PowerMac G5 Quad internal SATA bus.

Sustained Write

Maxtor 250GB 8MB hard drive is green. Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB 16MB model 7V300F0 is blue.

Once the Sustained Write test begins, the Maxline III 7V300F0 is about 10% faster than the stock Maxtor 250GB that comes with the PowerMac G5 Quad.

Random Read

Maxtor 250GB 8MB hard drive is green. Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB 16MB model 7V300F0 is blue.

In the Random Read test the two drives once again perform very closely.

Random Write

Maxtor 250GB 8MB hard drive is green. Maxtor MaxLine III 300GB 16MB model 7V300F0 is blue.

In the Random Write test the Maxline III 7V300F0 displays that it provides write capabilities exceeding the abilities of the stock Maxtor 250GB hard drive.

Performance
In order to see how the increased write performance of the Maxline III 7V300F0 might impact the PowerMac G5 Quad, several disk intensive tasks were performed. The PowerMac G5 Quad has 2.5GB of memory and Mac OS X 10.4.4 installed for these tests.

Activity on PowerMac G5 Quad Maxtor 250GB 6L250MO Maxline III 300GB 7V300F0
Startup 58 seconds 55 seconds
Repair Permissions 23 seconds 20 seconds
Duplicate 4.25GB 2:45 minutes 2:24 minutes
Launch Safari (1st time after restart) 3 seconds 3 seconds
Launch EyeTV 5 seconds 5 seconds
Save EyeTV file to disk (32 minute MPG-1) 7 seconds 6 seconds
Save EyeTV file to disk (42 minute MPG-2) 1:22 minutes 1:02 minutes
Import 4.19GB DVD (Pioneer 109) 5:54 minutes 5:54 minutes
Handbrake AVI AC3 conversion (96 min.) 23:09 minutes 22:36 minutes
Handbrake AVI AC3 Average Frame rates 99.62 fps 102.27 fps
Handbrake H.264 conversion (96 min.) 1:16:54 hours 1:16:54 hours
Handbrake H.264 Average Frame rates 29.92 fps 29.92 fps
Xbench Drive score 135 150
Xbench Overall Score 261 272
DiskTester Read/Write (142GB on drive) 47.99/50.04 54.94/57.91

The tests above indicate that the 300GB Maxline III model 7V300F0 can shave a few seconds off of the boot time and when repairing permissions. Where it really shines is in the file duplication test and saving an EyeTV MPEG-2 file to disk where it is between 10-30% faster. While the Maxline III 7V300F0 can help performance a little when creating an AVI, it is unable to make a difference with extreme processor intensive tasks like creating an H.264 video file. Xbench and DiskTester also display the Maxline III 7V300F0 as between 11-14% faster. The Maxline III 7V300F0 provides great performance when the Powermac G5 Quad is writing data to this SATA hard drive. I have not tested another single 300GB 7200 RPM hard drive that can get the PowerMac G5 Quad to perform quite as well as the Maxline III 7V300F0.

SuperDrive
Our PowerMac G5 Quad that was purchased as a build to order unit from the Apple Store, came with a Pioneer 110D DVR installed. The other Quad that was purchased through retail channels contained a Hitachi-LG Data Storage model GWA-4165B DVD Writable/CD-RW drive. It appears that Apple may be switching from Pioneer to the Hitachi-LG Data Storage model in currently shipping PowerMac G5 Quad builds. The LG GWA-4165B supports 16x DVD±R, 8x DVD+RW, 6x DVD-RW and 4x DVD±R DL writing. This allows Dual Layer discs of 8GB to be created. The LG GWA-4165B is a very capable optical drive with one exception. It has a read (RIP) speed limit for DVD±R at 10x and DVD±RW/±R DL at 8x. The LG GSA-4165B model has DVD-RAM 3x burning capability using firmware DL04 from Hitachi-LG. However, the LG GWA-4165B does not have this capability. As such, the Apple shipped LG GWA-4165B SuperDrive does not support DVD-RAM. In fact, if you insert a DVD-RAM disk into the Apple SuperDrive version of the GWA-4165B, the PowerMac G5 Quad can become confused.

To display how the LG read (RIP) speed limit may effect performance, the GWA-4165B is compared against a Pioneer A09XL and the Pioneer 110 below. In addition, the other specifications of the three units are listed as well. These tests were completed while the optical drives were installed in a PowerMac G5 Quad running 10.4.4.

DVR Comparison
Function Pioneer A09XL Pioneer 110 Pioneer 111 LG GWA-4165B
Import 4.2GB DVD 5:54 minutes 6:23 minutes 6:45 minutes 15:46 minutes
DVD-RAM Write No Yes Yes No
DVD-RAM Read No 2x 5x No
iLife 06 DL Support Yes Yes Yes Yes
16x DVD±R Yes Yes Yes Yes
8x DVD+RW Yes Yes Yes Yes
6x DVD-RW Yes Yes Yes Yes
4x DVD±R DL Yes Yes Yes Yes
8x DVD±R DL 6x Yes Yes No
40X CD-R Yes Yes Yes Yes
32X CD-RW 24x Yes Yes Yes

If your PowerMac G5 Quad came with a Pioneer 110 you will be able to import a DVD more than twice as fast as when using the LG GWA-4165B. In fact, it is interesting that the older Pioneer A09XL was the fastest at reading data.


Pioneer 110 -> A10XL
The Pioneer 110D is an inexpensive version of the Pioneer 110, with the only functional difference being that it cannot write to DVD-RAM. You can purchase a Pioneer 110D for about $44 from many on-line stores. A Pioneer 110D can be converted to a Pioneer DVR-A10XL with DVD-RAM capability by downloading the A10XL firmware and using DVRFlash Version 2.2 to upgrade the firmware in the 110D. Stuffit can decompress the archive to extract the two firmware files. Placing the two Pioneer A10XL firmware files in the same directory as DVRFlash and using the proper terminal command will re-flash the drive. After the conversion the Pioneer 110D has DVD-RAM read and write capability. Obviously, you make this conversion at your own risk and understand it may void the Pioneer 110D warranty. Most users will be happy with the Pioneer 110D just the way it is. If you do not use DVD-RAM, the firmware change is a waste of time and an added risk that you may turn your burner into a door stop.

Even if you do not upgrade the Pioneer 110D to support DVD-RAM you should upgrade it to 110D version 1.39 firmware or higher as this adds support for many more media brands which allows burning at higher speeds.

If the GWA-4165B is installed in your PowerMac G5 Quad and you like to backup DVDs, you will be much happier with a Pioneer A09XL or a Pioneer 110 installed. The upgrade fee is very minimal and it is easy to install yourself.

PCI Express
For many generations of PowerMac the PCI bus has been the chief vehicle for internal expansion. There are PCI video cards, audio cards, FireWire cards, USB 2.0 cards, SATA host adapters and IDE ATA host adapters that all work in these slots. Many of these cards work in PowerMac G5 PCI-X models as well as older Macintosh computers with PCI slots. As the PCI standard has been around for a while many of these solutions are relatively inexpensive. However, with the introduction of the PowerMac G5 "Oct 2005" Dual and Quad-Core PPC models, Apple has totally abandoned this standard and replaced all of the PCI-X slots with PCI Express slots also known as PCIe. None of the previously existing PCI cards will work with the new PCI Express slots as the bus design is totally different.



While PCI Express may have the ability to provide fast connectivity for video cards, some users are finding that FireWire 400 and 800 cards using PCI Express slots actually have slower performance than the Apple ports with the same function. In addition, users that want to expand their hard drive options using SATA host adapters are finding that very few solutions are currently shipping for PCI Express on the Macintosh. As SATA host adapter options appear they seem to perform either close to the same speed as the previous PCI-X card or a little slower. Most of the time the PCI Express card is also more expensive.

Based on the fact that PCI Express cards for Mac were not available with the introduction of the PowerMac G5 Quad, it appears that most 3rd party PCI developers had no idea that Apple was dumping PCI-X and substituting it with PCI Express until after the G5 Quad was announced. This has caused relatively few PCI Express offerings to be available even four months after the PowerMac Dual Core introduction. From our point of view, the PowerMac G5 Dual Core would have more upgrade options if it had at least one or two PCI-X slots. Several PC systems support both PCI and PCI Express. The only real change that moving to a pure PCI Express bus has provided so far, is a lack of much to put in the slots. In addition, even if the end user can find a new PCI Express alternative, it is usually costly. FireWire 400 cards in PCI Express format sell for $79.99, while a similar card is less than $20 in PCI format. It will take time for Macintosh developers to support PCI Express solutions and for the competition to bring down the prices to PCI levels.

A few PCI Express (PCIe) cards for the Quad that we were able to find that are currently shipping are listed below.
FireWire 800 card - SIIG NN-E38012-S1 $119.99 (slower write speed than Apple bus). A comparison showing the slower write speed is posted on-line.
FireWire 800 - FWB3414 FW800 $159 (Slower Write Speed) Review.
FireWire800/400/USB2 UFC2412 $159 Review.
6-Port FireWire 800/USB v2.0 Combo $149.95
FireWire 400 card - SIIG NN-E20012-S1 $79.99.
FireWire 400 card - FWA2414 $89.
SATA II card - RocketRAID 2320 $299 Review (No sleep support).
NVIDIA Geforce 6600 Graphics Upgrade Kit $199.

The list of available PCI Express cards for the Quad will grow each month but for existing PCI card owners it may be a costly transition. In the meantime, Apple will introduce the new MacTel PowerMacs within the next eight to ten months and who knows what type of PCI expansion format they might support. We hope that the new MacTel platform supports both PCI-X and PCI Express. In addition, it is time for the Apple PowerMac line to include built in SATA external ports with port multiplier capabilities, also known as SATA PM. SATA is faster than FireWire 800 and more reliable. Some Mac users (including one of the authors of this article), have lost data as a result of FireWire firmware changes and that risk continues to exist each time FireWire is altered. Existing enclosures cannot always adapt to the changes and data can be lost when introducing existing FireWire enclosures to a new generation of Macintosh. That risk does not exist with SATA enclosures as no bridge board is required.

Quad Energy Usage
One factor that many Macintosh users may not be aware of is the energy requirements of their particular computer. The PowerMac G5 Quad is the most powerful computer Apple has produced. With high power usually comes high electricity usage. In this next section, the Kill-a-Watt electricity usage monitor was used to compare the power usage of the Quad and several other computers. Energy settings are set on "Automatic" to allow the computer to reduce energy needs when it can do so. These measurements only include the computer. No monitor or external hard drives are considered in these figures.

Power Usage Compared in Watts
Activity G5 Quad G5 Dual 2.0 G4 400 Mac mini
Boot 228-320 172-278 61-74 23-33
Idle 160 135 53 14
iTunes Play 163-166 139-142 55 15
iTunes RIP 286-288 275-284 67-68 33-34
EyeTV 200 178-186 158-166 82 30
Create AVI
Frames per second
245-322
99.62
188-281
69.32
69-71
4.83
31
26.67
Create H.264
Frames per second
330-339
29.92
290-294
15.98
69-71
1.06
31
6.24
Halo 205-309 188-284 60-68 31-33
Sleep 17 10 15 2
Off 1 1 9 <1

The PowerMac G5 Quad electrical and environmental requirements state that it meets Energy Star requirements and that the maximum current is at least 10A (low voltage range) or 5A (high voltage range). The PowerMac G5 Quad Core has a 1000 watt power supply. The PowerMac G5 Quad used above only has the stock Nvidia 6600 graphics card, 2.5GB of memory and the original 250GB hard drive. The Quad is more than twice as powerful as the PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0 in CPU strength. However, in most cases it used less than 20% more energy. Creating an H.264 video file utilized the most energy and that task required about 15% more energy (45 watts) than the G5 Dual 2.0, yet the Quad was 187% faster. Creating an AVI also required 15% more energy and it was only 144% faster. In addition, while idle the Quad uses about 20% more power than the original PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0. Using sleep or turning the Quad off when not in use will save on electricity bills. In sleep mode the Quad uses close to the same amount of power as the PowerMac G4 400, but it requires 100 watts more power just to play a song in iTunes.

For the low CPU usage required by every day web browsing, email and word processing the Mac mini is a great low power solution. It would take approximately six to ten Mac mini computers to come close to the power consumption of a PowerMac G5 Quad. However, it will take Mac mini 4-5 times longer to create an H.264 video file. For a small home server that is on 24 hours a day the Mac mini only uses 15 watts while idle and only 22 watts with an EyeTV 200 connected. This is almost 1/3 of the power of a legacy PowerMac G4 400 and 1/7 of the power usage on an idle Quad. Selecting a computer with the right balance of CPU power versus energy consumption for your needs can save you money on your energy bill.

Based on the data above, I would use a Quad for high CPU intensive tasks like video and turn it off when finished. If the majority of my computing needs required very little high CPU usage or very little multimedia creation, a Mac mini would be an excellent computer choice. If you are using the Mac mini with an external FireWire 400 boot drive like the WiebeTech Maxelerate Max-250 to improve performance, you will need to add 10-14 watts to the Mac mini energy data above to get an accurate power measurement which includes that setup. In addition, if you use the EyeTV 200 you will need to add another 8 watts to the computers energy figures above as it draws its power from the computers FireWire 400 port. EyeTV 200 changes the Mac mini from 2 watts in sleep mode to 9-11 watts and from less than 1 watt when turned off to 7-9 watts usage.

What About the PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25GHz?
The Kill-a-Watt electricity usage monitor is a $30 device that helps you measure electricity usage. However it can easily be off plus or minus two watts. All of the Macintosh computers in the table above were measured with the same Kill-a-Watt unit so the results should be very comparable between each computer. While we were unable to get enough results on the PowerMac G4 1.25GHz dual to include it in the table above, we were able to get a few measurements with another Kill-a-Watt unit. The PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25GHz used 105-150 watts while booting, 142 watts while playing iTunes, 156 watts while ripping a CD, 11 watts while in sleep mode and 6 watts when turned off. These results indicate the PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25GHz will use about the same amount of energy as the PowerMac G5 2.0 Dual when idle, but substantially less when being utilized with CPU intensive applications.




More of a MacTruck than a MacLaren
The PowerMac G5 Quad is more like a truck than a race car. It has heavy towing capability. You will usually never discover the full power of the Quad unless you are running several CPU intensive applications at the same time. The PowerMac G5 Quad will not appear dramatically faster than previous PowerMac G5 models at web browsing, email or word processing. But if you place a high CPU load on it and/or utilize several high CPU applications at the same time, it will out perform the PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0GHz by a wide margin. The PowerMac G5 Quad is a sleeping giant that requires several intensive CPU applications running at once to see its amazing power handling capabilities.

Those PowerMac users that have invested in an array of existing PCI and PCI-X cards may be disappointed that the Quad will not be able to utilize them. One of the main reasons to buy a PowerMac these days is for expansion capability and the Quad has just become incompatible with every PCI card you ever bought. If you are not able to find PCI Express cards that meet your needs or the cost is prohibitive you may not want to make this upgrade. The internal PowerMac G5 Quad SATA hard drive bus is not significantly faster. It still uses an older SATA I interface. Until high quality SATA host adapters that support sleep and booting are available for the Quad, staying with the PowerMac G5 PCI-X models for RAID usage makes a lot of sense.

For pure processing power the PowerMac G5 Quad is awesome at creating AVI, H.264, compiling with XCode or working with demanding video programs that do not require a high speed RAID. As the Apple product line is going multi-core, the pressure will be on developers to release more and more multi-threaded applications. As such, the Quad should age very well. The Quad is very quiet compared to other PowerMac G5 and G4 models that were released in the last four years. While fans at startup can be a little loud, once the Quad has booted up the fan noise drops to a very quiet level. PowerMac G4 owners will find the Quad is substantially faster than what they were use to. The "Horse" Photoshop benchmark (Multiprocessor-aware filter) can be run on the Quad in 19 seconds. The PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25GHz requires 78 seconds to perform this the same task. As you can see the PowerMac G5 Quad can perform four times faster than the PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25GHz when used with multiprocessor-aware applications.


Pros

Provides the power of two dual core 2.5GHz processors.
PC2-4200, 533MHz SDRAM provides improved performance.
Much faster than the original PowerMac G5 for CPU intensive tasks.
Can compress AVI video files using Handbrake at 100 fps.
Can compress H.264 video files using Handbrake at 30 fps.
Supports FireWire 800 connections.
Optical audio inputs and outputs.
Easy to upgrade or add up to two 3.5" SATA hard drives.
16x SuperDrive with Dual layer support included.
Easy to upgrade LG SuperDrive with Pioneer 110.
Fan engineering and cooling system keeps heat under control.
While startup is not quiet, Quad is quieter than original PowerMac G5.
Two ethernet ports for advanced networks.
Standard Nvidia 6600 has dual DVI connections.
High Performance Nvidia 7800 GT available with build to order models.
Unplugging a device from the front USB/FW ports does not wake computer.

Cons
Does not support PCI or PCI-X cards.
Pioneer 110 is not provided in all models.
Should ship with at least 1GB of memory.
No external SATA ports.
Internal SATA bus needs to be updated to an SATA II interface.
Nvidia 7800 GT not available as a separate purchase.
Relatively high power usage when idle.
Uses 160 watts just to play a song in iTunes.
Sleep mode uses 17 watts instead of 10 watts with original PowerMac G5.
PCI Express cards are usually more expensive than PCI cards.
PCI Express cards for FireWire typically perform slower than Apple ports.
PCI Express SATA cards may perform slower than PCI-X alternatives.
Cannot mount more than two internal SATA drives in stock configuration.
Not significantly faster than PowerMac G5 2.0GHz for low CPU usage.
No ability to have two internal optical drives.
Power cord connector is non-standard.
Uses non-standard optional Airport card.
No internal modem.


PowerMac G5 Quad gets 4 AMUGs out of 5!
Unless you are spending most of the day compiling Xcode or working with the latest video tools to create multimedia presentations or movies you probably do not need a PowerMac G5 Quad Core. For normal Macintosh applications like playing music, email, web browsing and even playing Halo, the PowerMac G5 Quad did not provide a significant advantage versus the original PowerMac G5 2.0GHz Dual. However, when compressing video using Handbrake, the Quad was able to convert a 141 minute movie to AVI AC3 in 24 minutes versus 37 minutes on the PowerMac G5 2.0GHz Dual. If H.264 was required, the Quad could convert the movie in 1:17 hours while the G5 2.0GHz Dual required 2:22 hours. When the CPU work load is the highest, the Quad performs amazingly well. The only real drawback with the Quad for some PowerMac users will be the total lack of PCI or PCI-X support. The PowerMac G5 Quad-Core is available on Amazon for $3,099.99 after a $200 mail in rebate.

Contact Information:
Apple
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino,, California 95014
Phone: 408.996.1010
http://www.apple.com/contact/

Copyright 2006
Arizona Macintosh Users Group, Inc. (AMUG)
Visit AMUG at www.amug.org for computer news, and resources.
JOIN AMUG!


Additional Information
Power Mac G5 (Late 2005) diagnostic LEDs
Power Mac G5 (Late 2005) Technical Brief (Manual)
MacWorld Quad Review
PC Magazine Quad review